Equip Yourself With Knowledge
Chlorine Dioxide as an Alternative Treatment for COVID-19 by Manuel Aparicio MD. Click here to read the groundbreaking study.
When was the last time you heard any organization or individual cured one of the 30,000 known diseases? How much longer until information on the 1962 discovery of the primo vascular system is added to textbooks? Federal agencies have maintained a brainwashing anticure position on disease in general, especially in regard to viral infections, for about one century. City and state officials must be the ones to mandate emergency clinical trials on the well- researched and extremely promising infection control molecule chlorine dioxide STAT.
On April 23, 2020 the sitting United States President Donald Trump postulated that people might internally use a bleaching disinfectant as treatment for COVID-19 . The following publications from reputable science journals serve as supporting evidence that the bleaching disinfectant chlorine dioxide is viable as both infection control and as a preventative measure during a virus pandemic:
 Controlled clinical evaluations of chlorine dioxide, chlorite and chlorate in man.
 Chlorine Dioxide Water Disinfection: A Praspective Epidemiology Study.
 A Randomized Double Blind Crossover Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Assess the Effects of a Mouthwash Containing Chlorine Dioxide on Oral Malodor.
 Clinical and microbiological efficacy of chlorine dioxide in the management of chronic atrophic candidiasis: an open study.
 Antiviral Effect of Chlorine Dioxide against Influenza Virus and Its Application for Infection Control.
 Chlorine Dioxide Is a Size-Selective Antimicrobial Agent.
The first study referenced above involved people who were administered oral chlorine dioxide and it was determined that “… by the absence of detrimental physiological responses within the limits of the study, the relative safety of chlorine dioxide, was demonstrated” .
The second study determined after a period of 12 weeks where people had consumed drinking water treated with chlorine dioxide that the statistical analysis (ANOVA) of the data “…failed to identify any significant exposure-related effects” .
After intraoral chlorine dioxide was administered as mouthwash to people in the third study, it was determined, “Organoleptic measurements scores with chlorine dioxide were significantly [better] than those without [chlorine dioxide] at all examination times” .
After intraoral chlorine dioxide was administered as mouthwash to people in the fourth study, it was determined, “Chlorine dioxide significantly improved the clinical appearance and microbial count after treatment, without significant side effects” .
When participants in the fifth consumed gaseous chlorine dioxide and live viruses in tandem, excellent results led a researcher in virus pandemic prevention to state “The pandemic will cause the freeze of social activity and the crisis of business continuity, having a serious impact on the global economy consequently… we propose new preventive measures against the flu pandemic utilizing chlorine dioxide in addition to normal preventive methods” .
After the biochemical mode of action was evaluated and outlined in the sixth publication, it was determined “Chlorine dioxide is a size selective antimicrobial agent which can kill micron sized organisms rapidly but cannot make real harm to much larger organisms like animals or humans as it is not able to penetrate deeply into their living tissues” .
The first reference serves as supporting evidence that chlorine dioxide is safe for oral consumption using similar protocol and under similar conditions. The conclusions made in the second trial reinforce the claims made by researchers in the first because both trials were conducted very similarly, and similar conclusions were arrived at. Chlorine dioxide demonstrated medicinal properties in the third trial by safely improving pathogenic overgrowth inside people. The conclusions made in the fourth trial reinforce the claims made by the researchers in the third because both trials were conducted very similarly, and similar conclusions were arrived at. The fifth serves as supporting evidence that chlorine dioxide can safely be used as infection control and as a preventative measure during a virus pandemic. The sixth explains why using certain protocol, and under certain conditions, chlorine dioxide is safe for oral consumption, by stating that it is an antimicrobial agent that cannot make real harm to humans because it is not able to penetrate deeply into human living tissues.
Chlorine dioxide as consumable antiviral medication has become extremely popular in Latin America now. The list of supportive licensed practicing medical doctors who stand with the medical coalition COMUSAV has reached quadruple digits. The pandemic is now a battle between federal agencies that are determined to brainwash the masses with their anti-cure position, and subnational governments that seek to crush the virus swiftly, as Bolivia did .
 A double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on humans and published in the science journal Toxicological Sciences. It outlines the protocol and conditions whereby chlorine dioxide is safe for oral consumption (Lubbers, Judith 1981; eISSN 1094-2025).
 An epidemiology study was conducted and its findings were published in the international science journal Archives of Environmental Health. It involved 198 people who consumed drinking water that had been treated with chlorine dioxide during a 12- week period. Average concentration levels were about 7 mg/ L. It was determined that the statistical analysis (ANOVA) of the data “…failed to identify any significant exposure-related effects” (Miday, Robert 1981; eISSN 2331-4303).
 A randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted and its findings were published in the peer-reviewed science journal Trials by the publisher BioMed Central. Chlorine dioxide demonstrated medicinal properties by safely improving pathogenic overgrowth inside people more than any other mouthwash used in the study (Shinada, Kayoko 2008; ISSN: 1745-6215).
 A clinical trial was conducted and its findings were published in the International Dental Journal. Like Shinada’s trial, it was determined that chlorine dioxide demonstrated medicinal properties by safely improving pathogenic overgrowth inside people (Mohammad, Abdel 2004; ISSN 0020-6539).
 A study was conducted and its findings were published in the science journal The Open Antimicrobial Agents Journal in order to determine how effective chlorine dioxide is for infection control during a virus pandemic. In 2010 Japanese clinical researcher Takanori Miura warned the scientific community about future pandemics and fervently desired that chlorine dioxide be considered as a solution. He stated “The pandemic will cause the freeze of social activity and the crisis of business continuity, having a serious impact on the global economy consequently… we propose new preventive measures against the flu pandemic utilizing chlorine dioxide in addition to normal preventive methods.” Miura determined that no toxic metabolites could be identified when subjects were administered radiolabeled 36CLO2. It was also determined “…that the tyrosine residue and tryptophan residue were oxidized. Therefore, it was suggested that the mechanism of action of chlorine dioxide to inactivate the influenza virus was specific oxidative modification of these two amino acid residues” (Miura, Takanori 2010; ISSN 1876-5181).
 A study was conducted and its findings were published in the peer-reviewed Science Journal the Public Library of Science ONE. It explained the biochemical mode of action of chlorine dioxide and determined that while using certain protocol and under certain conditions chlorine dioxide cannot make real harm to humans as it is not able to penetrate deeply into our living tissues (Noszticzius, Zoltán 2013; eISSN 1932-6203).
 On August 5, 2020 Bolivia’s Senate approved chlorine dioxide as oral treatment for COVID-19. An exponential decrease in the new case numbers occurred right afterward. Deaths substantially decreased as well. By mid-October they crushed the virus as shown above and by the end of November their lives began to return to normal. Later on November 28th President Luis Arce issued a decree mandating all COVID-19 patients in Bolivia be offered chlorine dioxide as voluntary oral treatment without requiring any doctor’s prescription.
 On September 30, 2020 Governor Félix Patzi of La Paz, Bolivia mandated a clinical trial on chlorine dioxide as treatment for COVID-19. This was after having witnessed such phenomenal results shown in the graphs above. The trial was completed in February of 2021 and the results can be viewed by clicking here. Astounding results. Governor Patzi’s heroic stance on using oral chlorine dioxide as treatment for COVID-19 earned himself a medal bestowed by a civic committee on December 23rd. Currently the Bolivian army is helping to certify chlorine dioxide by creating regulations for its manufacturing and sales. The President of Bolivia Luis Arce formally congratulated the Technical University of Oruro for helping safely and affordably cure many COVID-19 patients by producing chlorine dioxide.
 After military doctors informed the Mayor of Campeche, Mexico Eliseo Montúfar about chlorine dioxide’s therapeutic benefits he immediately decided to help provide this treatment to Mexican citizens. A major drop in Mexico’s new case numbers occurred right afterward.
 Medical director and surgeon Dr. Manuel Alonso publicly states, “…there are many studies that prove that [chlorine dioxide] is not toxic, both in animals and in humans.” He then proceeds to reference several specific scientific studies that have been conducted on chlorine dioxide’s safety and efficacy as antiviral medicine.
https://a7.com.mx/index.php?notaid=68578 (Español) (English)
 Businessman Pedro Bringas offers $500,000 to whoever conducts a clinical trial proving chlorine dioxide is ineffective at treating people with COVID-19. No one has taken up his offer as of July 20, 2021.
 Testimonial statement by intensive care specialist Dr. Alfredo Garrido about a cure for COVID-19. He himself was proven COVID-19 positive from an antibody test and chose to consume oral chlorine dioxide as treatment. After experiencing a rapid recovery he stated “If someone in my close environment falls ill with coronavirus, or simply asks me for advice from a preventive point of view, I would recommend the treatment that I have followed. I wouldn’t hesitate for a second.”
 April 23, 2020 the sitting US President Donald Trump’s press briefing video and disinfectant remark see minute 26:57 for relevancy. President Trump directly instructed Department of Homeland Security under-secretary for science and technology William Bryan to investigate the viability of the disinfectant (chlorine dioxide bleach in all likelihood) as antiviral treatment. A linguistic analysis would reveal that sarcasm was absent from Trump’s tone even though he claimed he was being sarcastic.
Agencies and Organizations That Have Approved and Outlined Chlorine Dioxide’s Usage in Food and Water Sources
 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
 Center for Disease Control (CDC)
 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
 World Health Organization (WHO)
*This Website Is Intended to Equip Government Officials, Sheriffs, Lawyers/Attorneys, Judges and Medical Doctors With Adequate Supporting Evidence To Justify Mandating Emergency Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Peer-Reviewed Clinical Trials on Oral Chlorine Dioxide as Treatment for COVID-19 and/or Its Variants. Clinical Trial Reference Number NCT0434374 Outlines and Explains the Protocol*